Forum For Philosophy
In Collaboration with
HSS Dept. & IOE,
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Organising a Workshop on
Agency and Value
Theme Note of the Conference
We all live in society and are tied to a web of social relations. These relations or the social fabrics are grounded on values. These values are defining features of human existence. With values, human civilization has been sustaining and flourishing. No doubt there are ups and downs, still, humanity has aspired always to encounter challenges. What we are, depends on how we live and act morally in everyday life. The moral or ethical attitudes of an individual are defined by choice and action. Human actions are generally evaluated from a moral point of view. Either the action is praised or condemned, but in all cases, it involves the agent who performs it. The agent is held morally responsible for bringing out an action. The nature of human agency is such that it is actively engaged in performing actions. Actions are inevitable in human life. Our active engagement is driven by desire, inclination, anxiety, love, hatred and fear. Through all these, we connect to the world and live. This living is indeed becoming living in isolation. As Pojman summarizes, “The immediate, existential condition of humanity is alienation. We find ourselves driven by desire; cravings which are never really satisfied, for any desires never meet, leaving us frustrated, if they are satisfied, the satisfaction is ephemeral.”1 The isolated form of existence that empowers our individualism is an attitude which is a product of modernity. It has taught me how to exercise one’s interest and be reasonably rational in creating safeguards so that my interest prevails. In this connection, Taylor writes, “We live in a world where people have the right to choose for themselves their own pattern of life, to decide in conscience what convictions to espouse, to determine the shape of their lives in a whole host of ways that their ancestors could not control. And these rights are generally defended by our legal systems. In principle, people are no longer sacrificed to the demands of supposedly sacred orders that transcend them.”2 Individualism is nurtured and protected by the host of institutions developed by modern societal thinking. The individual who grew up in this environment of modernity has been engaged in resolving the inner conflicts of its institutions. It has forgotten about the sacred state of life which could be realized by transcending every rational-logical engagement.
Life is not only materially conditioned by the desire to possess and become, [ ‘being and its becoming’] but also is associated with anxiety and fear of loss. Still, the passion does not end and one continues to strive and live through to gain the maximum. This has been a common motif of living a luxurious and comfortable life. At the same time, it has not completely taken away the intense aspiration to know the higher or the spiritual. The power of achievement in the world fails to arrest this aspiration and puts the person continuously in a state of unfulfillment and quest for knowing the infinite and the absolute truth of life. As Sinari illustrates “Had man not been constantly a seeking at the core, he would not have created the most complex civilizations ever with its science and technology and their countless gifts and remained restless, despaired, and insecure.”3 Most of us experience restlessness, despair and insecurity because our wants and desires are yet to be defined normatively, in the sense that there is a mismatch between the common good of the good of the individual.
The loss of moral conscience and convictions is a great threat to human dignity. War and violence against humanity have also caused a serious loss of human dignity. May be more rigorous ways of cultivating virtues might help in overcoming difficulties. Commitment, integrity and responsibility are core concepts discussed in normative ethics.4 In the theoretical framework of normative ethics, the character of the agent is significant as it is guided by the norms and values. The character is reflected in normative thinking and action. Norms help in evaluating the intentional content of desire, motive and the intention of action. Actions being guided by norms disclose the agent’s commitment to truth. The development of moral character demands normative thinking or phronesis which is necessary for acting with virtues. Normative thinking is essential for making a case for living life with dignity. It is analogous to the act of making a quilt. A quilt is made after putting the cotton saris or cotton layer by layer and these saris are finally stitched. And once the saris are stitched the quit is made. A moral character is made not only by following norms but also by cultivating virtues in everyday life. It is the cultivation of value in life which builds a moral character. An agent must represent moral character and act morally. Human existence thus could be defined as having normative existence as we are persons known for our conduct and attitudes. A moral person displays commitment, responsibility, and obligation in his or her engagement in everyday life.5 Normative existence, in this regard, is defined through the moral content of action. And, as actions are evaluated using certain moral standards maintained in our forms of life their maintenance shows how the standards regulate our everyday activities. The regulative power helps in describing, examining, and synthesizing, the moral content of the existing activities of the person. Since human beings live very dynamic and sophisticated social lives these standards need to be equally commanding to evaluate all human expressions and deeds. In this regard, many institutions are built up to explain the normative function for the realization of both the individual and the common good.
No doubt groups and teams work to achieve certain common goals – the common good. Such activities bring to our notice the notion of collective moral agency. Unlike the individual agentive function, the collective agency has an important role in making institutions and institutional facts in our civilizational existence.6 When the institutional existence and function of the collective agency are philosophized, one encounters theoretical and practical challenges. For instance, we do reward a team for its achievement and also blame it when it does not fulfil its societal commitment. Both reward and punishment sometimes create internal tension – i.e., conflict among its constitutive members. So, how to determine their existence and explain their function systematically has been a challenging task for philosophers. One of the theoretical challenges, in this connection that Robert Audi points out, “It derives in part from the naturalistic worldview commonly thought to be supported by the progress of science, the view that natural world (the universe conceived as containing no supernatural beings) is the whole of reality and that scientific method is the only reliable route to general knowledge of reality.
This naturalism seems to leave no place for value: for what is intrinsically good or intrinsically bad. Science is supposed to be ‘value-free’, to make no judgments of value beyond those warranted by its internal standards of evidence used to assess claims to truth in terms of scientific acceptability.”7 One can assume the autonomy of science and scientific method that is often undertaken while discussing epistemological and ontological issues concerning reality. At the same time, it is also difficult to ignore the notion of value and value engagement that matters to humanity. In this context, there is a need to reflect upon the nature of collective agency and its normative engagement which gives birth to institutional facts. As facts, per se as Ludwig Wittgenstein claims in the opening verse of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (in short TLP)8 “The world is all that is the case. It is the totality of facts, not of things. The world is divided into facts.” (#1, 1.1 and 1.2) Wittgenstein does not refer to institutional facts in TLP, (but since facts are central to the study of the world; it is important to understand the nature of facts that are independent of human engagements and also dependent or formed by the very existence and the function of the collective. It is because; the actions whether individual or collective affect the world. We are concerned with the collective moral agency, particularly how the collective engagement with the world forms institutions and institutional facts.
John Searle while explaining the nature of institutional facts does theorize about the ontology of institutions. The notion of collective moral agency is very much part of the ontology of the institution. However, Searle’s naturalistic worldview seems to be problematic while explaining the ontology of institutions in terms of assimilating the biological with the normative. W. H. von Wright, on the other hand, enlightens us by narrating the primacy of the normative so far as the ontological status function of the collective is concerned.9 We need to reflect on these conflicting perspectives while addressing the issue of the ontology of collective moral agency vis-a-vis the ontology of institution and institutional facts. In our analysis, we give primacy to the normative over the biological normative thesis maintained by Searle.10 However, we do not completely reject the functional significance of the ontology of the institutional collective; rather try to view that the ground of collective relation could be experienced as we comprehend meaning and value. What emerges from this discussion is the intrinsic relationship between language and norms. In a normative framework of language use the status of ontology of institution and institutional facts is not overlooked; rather it redefines the status of collective moral agency. But if the notion of ontology is overlooked, will that affect the discourse of moral agency seriously?
Call for Papers
Papers are invited on the following Subthemes of the Conference:
- Moral Agency
- Consciousness, Free will and Normativity
- Intentionality and Human Action
- Emotion and Action
- Norms and Action
- Weakness of Will – Akratic Action
- Indian Philosophy of Action and Agency
- Collective intentionality and Group / Joint Action
- Language, Norms and Institutions
Details of Paper Submission
Interested participants are requested to submit abstracts of not more than 300 words (excluding author details and references) in Word Format. Abstracts should be based on original work related to the theme of the conference.
The Font size should be Time New Roman, 12 font, space 1.5. Details of the presenter should be mentioned on the first page. The word limit is 4000-5000 words. Last Date for Abstract- 10th May 2024; full Paper submission on or before 20th May 2024. Kindly follow the deadline for submission. Selected Papers will be published in the Philosophy journal. Email articles to archgoure@philosophy.mu.ac.in
Best Paper Award - Justice Kodandaramaya Research Award (2024)
This award is open only for Ph.D. Research Scholars in Philosophy.
- The objective of the award is to encourage independent and original research on the theme of the conference. The research paper must develop a cogent idea, implied within the work undertaken.
- Best articles selected by the judges will be published in the Journal of Philosophy. The best five researchers will also get the opportunity to present their papers to the Research Scholars Panel during the conference schedule. Among those judges will choose the best three Papers for the Award.
- Best paper will get a Cash Prize as well as a Certificate of Appreciation.
- The Font size should be Times New Roman, 12 font, space 1.5. Details of the Researcher should be mentioned on the first page. Word limits 4000-5000 words. Researchers should email their articles to archgoure@philosophy.mu.ac.in C.C. to srilakshmi.peddada@gmail.com. The last date of submission is 15th May 2024.
Date and Time
3-4 June 2024 (10.30 a.m. to 5.00 p.m.)
Venue
Seminar Hall, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai-Mumbai 400076
The event is now completed, please click on the button given below to view photos and video of the event.